The Greatest F1 Tracks No Longer In Use

Iconic, high-speed, and often perilous venues like the original Nürburgring Nordschleife, Reims-Gueux, and the old Hockenheimring are among the greatest F1 tracks no longer in use. These legendary circuits, featuring dangerous, fast layouts or unique street configurations, have been replaced by safer, modern tracks due to changing safety regulations and the evolution of F1…

Want more F1Chronicle.com coverage? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for the best F1 news and analysis on the internet.

Nürburgring Nordschleife

The Nordschleife did not get replaced by a better race track. It got replaced by reality. At over 22.8 km, with constant elevation change and a corner count that never gives a driver a mental pause, it demanded an approach closer to endurance racing than modern grand prix rhythm. The lap time was long, the circuit was narrow, and a single incident could block rescue access for minutes that felt like hours.

What it was like to race there

A Nordschleife lap stacked risk in layers. First came the geography, blind crests, compressions, and off-camber corners that shifted load through the tyre carcass in ways that punished weak suspension control. Then came the surface, which could vary by section, with temperature and grip changing across the lap in a way that made a single setup compromise unavoidable.

A long lap also changed tyre and brake behaviour. Temperatures did not rise and fall in tidy cycles. Brake cooling was harder to judge because each heavy stop came after long, full-throttle runs. Tyres could be perfect in one sector and sliding in another, with no easy way to “reset” the lap.

It also changed race control in a basic operational sense. Marshals, medical access, and recovery vehicles had a huge area to cover. Even with strong organisation, response time could never match a compact circuit.

The moments people still talk about

The track’s legend comes from performances that looked superhuman on a stopwatch. It also comes from how often the place punished small errors. A missed apex did not just cost time. It could put a car onto grass at high speed with little runoff and a barrier waiting.

The final era of F1 at the Nordschleife became defined by the tension between spectacle and safety. Drivers pushed for safer conditions. The circuit’s scale made meaningful modernisation difficult in the time frame the sport demanded. 

Why F1 stopped using it

F1’s last world championship race on the Nordschleife came in 1976, after years of safety concern and a growing sense that the circuit’s length and infrastructure could not deliver modern rescue standards. The catalyst was not nostalgia or opinion. It was the sport’s safety trajectory colliding with what the circuit physically was. 

Key track facts

• Length: about 22.8 km, about 14.2 mi 
• Corner count: commonly cited as 170 plus corners 
• Last F1 championship race on this layout: 1976 

Circuit de Reims Gueux

Reims Gueux was fast in a way that modern F1 circuits are not allowed to be. Not “big brake zones and long straights” fast. Proper slipstream, commitment, and nerve fast, built on public road geometry, long flat out sections, and the kind of braking points that arrived with little warning.

What made the layout special

The circuit’s defining feature was speed sustained across multiple straights, linked by corners that rewarded clean exits and stable high speed aero balance. Cars spent long stretches at full throttle. That created two technical pressures that still translate today.

First, cooling. Long high load running with cars in a tow stressed water and oil temperatures and exposed weak ducting decisions. Second, braking stability. When heavy braking arrives after long high speed sections, pad temperature and pedal feel become a bigger part of the driving job, especially with traffic and slipstream.

Reims also amplified the draft effect. A small speed gain from exit traction or gearing could turn into a pass two straights later. That is a different racing problem from modern downforce heavy circuits, where wake turbulence can erase the benefit.

The history that gives it weight

Reims hosted major grands prix in the early decades of the world championship and became part of the sport’s visual memory through its pit buildings and long, open road layout. It felt like a national event, not a stadium sport.

That same public road character shaped its limits. When F1’s speeds rose and safety expectations shifted, the circuit faced the hard truth shared by many road based venues: barriers, access routes, and runoffs were never built for the next era.

Why F1 stopped using it

Reims Gueux fell away as safety standards and event economics moved on. Its last French Grand Prix came in the mid 1960s, and the venue did not return as F1’s requirements expanded. 

Key track facts

• Style: high speed public road triangle layout with heavy slipstreaming 
• Last F1 world championship event at Reims: 1966 

Hockenheimring

When people mourn “old Hockenheim,” they are not talking about nostalgia for trees. They are talking about a racing problem that no longer exists on the calendar: long, flat out forest straights that turned engine power, drag, and braking integrity into the whole story, then dropped you into a stadium section that punished any weakness in low speed traction.

The original layout’s technical signature

Old Hockenheim forced a low drag approach. Teams trimmed wings to chase top speed, then had to live with a car that felt nervous in the slower corners. That trade off was honest. You chose your compromise, then the circuit made you pay for it on lap time.

The repeated high speed to heavy braking cycles also battered brakes and tyres. A car that looked stable on a tighter circuit could feel loose under these decel loads, especially when following another car and losing clean airflow to the front wing.

It also created a distinct overtaking rhythm. The tow into chicanes was a real weapon. Drivers had to time exits and manage battery and fuel to arrive in the braking zone with position and momentum.

Why it changed

The forest straights were removed when the circuit was shortened in a redesign that aimed to reduce speed, improve safety, and tighten the event footprint for spectators and operations. The new layout kept the venue on the calendar, but the specific original challenge stopped existing. 

Why the original is no longer in use

This is not “F1 left Hockenheim.” It is “F1 lost old Hockenheim.” The circuit still exists in modern form, yet the long forest layout that built its reputation is gone by design. 

Key track facts

• Defining feature: extended forest straights and heavy braking cycles
• Change point: shortened layout introduced in 2002 

Adelaide Street Circuit

Adelaide was a street circuit that raced like a proper circuit. The surface was public road rough, the walls were close, and the place rewarded drivers who could manage grip change across a weekend as rubber built up on asphalt that was never designed for race tyres.

What the circuit demanded

Street circuits compress the decision making window. The entry speed is high, the sight lines are tight, and the penalty for an error is instant. Adelaide added a second layer: season ending pressure. It sat at the end of the calendar, so the racing often carried championship consequence.

From a setup point of view, it demanded traction and stability. Public roads create micro bumps and surface joins that can unsettle a car on corner entry. Teams needed compliance in suspension without letting the car roll into understeer.

Heat management was also real. With limited airflow in traffic and heavy acceleration zones, cooling margins could tighten, especially if a car sat in a train.

Why it left the calendar

Adelaide hosted the Australian Grand Prix from 1985 through 1995. The race then moved to Albert Park Circuit for 1996. The reasons were commercial and political, tied to hosting arrangements and the push for a different event model. 

Key track facts

• F1 hosted years: 1985 to 1995 
• Replaced by Albert Park from 1996 

Sepang International Circuit

Sepang was the rare modern circuit that still created old school racing problems. Heat, sudden tropical rain, tyre management under high surface temperature, and a layout that asked for both aero efficiency and traction. It produced races where strategy shifts were driven by physics, not just timing screens.

Why Sepang produced proper racing

The lap mixed long straights with linked medium speed corners, which meant teams could not optimise one area without losing another. Run too much wing and you got mugged on the straights. Trim the car and you slid through the long corners and cooked tyres.

Heat was central. High ambient temperature pushed tyre pressures and brake cooling. A car that looked fine on a cool day could struggle when the track baked. That created variation in performance and opened up strategy, especially on tyre choice and stint length.

Sepang also punished poor driver feel. Long loaded corners build tyre temperature steadily. If a driver leaned too hard on the fronts early, the lap got longer and longer as grip bled away.

Why it disappeared

The Malaysian Grand Prix ran at Sepang from 1999 through 2017, then dropped off the calendar. The public explanation centred on cost and attendance, with the promoter citing that the event no longer made financial sense against modern hosting fees. 

Key track facts

• F1 hosted years: 1999 to 2017 
• Exit driver: event economics and demand

Watkins Glen International

Watkins Glen felt like a European circuit dropped into American terrain. Fast corners, elevation change, and a lap that rewarded rhythm. It also showed how quickly F1’s standards can outgrow a venue when investment does not keep pace.

The racing character

The Glen rewarded commitment through high speed sections where a stable rear end and clean steering inputs paid off. That made it a driver’s circuit in the purest sense. A tidy lap looked effortless. A messy lap looked like survival.

It also punished weak braking stability. High speed entries into key corners demanded confidence in pedal feel. With older era tyres and less electronic help, that was a real skill separator.

Why it left

The United States Grand Prix at Watkins Glen ended in 1980. Financial pressure and increasing safety and facility demands were central factors as the sport’s expectations rose. 

Key track facts

• F1 hosted span: 1961 to 1980 
• End point: 1980 

Kyalami Grand Prix Circuit

Kyalami sat at altitude, which changed engine behaviour and cooling margins, then combined that with a flowing layout that rewarded balance more than brute force. It was the kind of track where a car that turned cleanly could look better than a car that had more power.

Why it stood out

Altitude reduces air density. That shifts aero load, cooling performance, and engine output. Teams had to adjust cooling openings and accept aero trade offs that they would not take at sea level. That adds a layer of engineering compromise that modern calendars rarely force.

The layout itself asked for stability and timing. You carried speed, you linked corners, you used kerbs with care. That made it a circuit where setup and driver feel merged.

Why it dropped off

South Africa’s last F1 race at Kyalami came in 1993. The event then disappeared from the calendar amid broader commercial and political realities around hosting. 

Key track facts

• Last F1 race at Kyalami: 1993 

Fuji Speedway

Fuji is still active as a circuit, yet it remains absent from the F1 calendar. Its appeal is obvious: a long straight that creates real braking opportunities and a layout that can reward both speed and traction. Its absence is not about racing quality.

What Fuji offered in F1 terms

A long straight forces honest top speed, then demands braking and stability at the end of it. That creates passing attempts that are not dependent on complex aero wake management. It also tests brake cooling and tyre loading from heavy decel, which can expose weak setups.

Weather can also play a role. Fuji’s conditions can shift quickly, and that can flip strategy and tyre choice in a way that rewards sharp decision making.

Why it is not there now

Fuji has appeared on the F1 calendar in different eras, yet it has not held a permanent modern slot. Calendar rotation, promoter economics, and broader scheduling priorities shape that reality more than circuit quality. 

Key track facts

• Fuji has hosted F1 in multiple periods rather than a continuous long run 

The best lost F1 circuits did not vanish due to a lack of racing soul, they vanished when safety, money, and modern event expectations stopped matching what the venues could realistically deliver.

Analysis for this article was provided by Bet 365, where you can use the bet365 referral code for new customers.