How Do F1 Drivers Learn Each Track?

• F1 drivers learn each track through a layered process of simulator sessions, onboard video study, track walks, and engineering briefings before they ever turn a competitive lap.
• Factory simulators built from LiDAR-scanned 3D circuit models allow drivers to memorise braking points, racing lines, and gear changes weeks before arriving at the venue.
• Real-time telemetry and post-session debriefs between practice runs let drivers refine their approach corner by corner across a race weekend.

How F1 Drivers Learn Each Track Before Arriving

F1 drivers learn each track long before they arrive at the circuit. The process starts at the team factory, typically two to three weeks ahead of a race weekend, and combines simulator driving, video analysis, and detailed engineering briefings. With the 2026 calendar featuring 24 grands prix across six continents, drivers need to carry a working knowledge of more than 20 unique layouts in their heads at any given time. Each circuit has its own character, from the low-speed technical sections of Monaco to the high-speed sweeps of Silverstone, and the preparation for each one follows a structured but personalised routine that varies from driver to driver.

Simulator Sessions: The Foundation of Circuit Learning

The F1 simulator is the single most important tool in a driver’s track-learning process. Every team operates a driver-in-the-loop simulator at its factory, a full cockpit replica mounted on a motion platform with force feedback, projected visuals, and real-time telemetry output. The virtual circuits loaded into these simulators are built from LiDAR scans, where laser imaging captures a millimetre-accurate 3D model of every kerb, bump, camber change, and surface variation on the real track.

Drivers typically spend two to three days per week in the simulator during the season, with sessions intensifying in the lead-up to a race weekend. For a circuit the driver already knows, the work focuses on testing new car setups and refining strategy. For a brand-new venue joining the calendar, preparation is more intensive, with teams scheduling additional days dedicated entirely to learning the track layout, identifying braking reference points, and understanding how the car’s aerodynamic balance shifts through different corner types.

The simulator is not universally loved, though. Lewis Hamilton chose to skip Ferrari’s simulator entirely ahead of the 2026 Canadian Grand Prix after feeling that the setup work he did on the sim before Miami had actively misled him. “You know I don’t like simulators in general,” Hamilton told media in Montreal, “but I sit at the simulator every week on the build up to this race, working on correlation constantly and you go on it, you prepare for the track, you drive it and you get the car setup to a certain place and then you come to the track and that set up doesn’t work.” He described a cycle of frustration where “you find a set-up that you’re comfortable with, you get to the track and everything is opposite. So, then you’re undoing the things you’ve learned.”

Hamilton’s decision to step away paid off immediately. After a second-place finish in Canada, he was clear about the correlation. “I didn’t do the sim, and it was the best I’ve felt all year, so I think that’s the way forward for me,” he said. Without simulator work filling his preparation schedule, Hamilton found he could invest more time elsewhere. “I was able to just focus on training and not be distracted,” he explained. “And the second part is just like really going through with a fine comb on ride stability, through corner balances and mechanical balance. And I chose a setup that we’ve never used before and it’s transformed the car for me.” It was a striking reminder that the simulator is a tool, not a guarantee, and that for some drivers the instinct built over two decades of racing can outperform any virtual model.

Onboard Video and Visualisation

Before touching the simulator, most drivers prepare by using brain training apps and watching onboard camera footage. This is particularly important for circuits that are new to the calendar or ones that a driver is visiting for the first time. Track maps, footage from previous F1 races, F2 support races, or even amateur laps uploaded to YouTube all serve as reference material. The goal is to build a mental picture of the track’s flow, understanding where the fast sections are, where the heavy braking zones sit, and how the corners link together in sequence.

Max Verstappen has spoken openly about his unconventional approach to this stage of preparation. “So, if I would come to a new track, first thing what I would do is, of course, you look at onboards. Whatever you can find,” he explained in a conversation with presenter Chris Harris. But Verstappen goes further than video. “What I actually also like to do is look at Google Maps sometimes. So you just have it in your head,” he said, describing how the satellite view lets him visualise each turn and straight from above before he ever arrives at the venue. He pairs this aerial perspective with onboard footage, then uses his first out-lap in the car during free practice as his real track walk, driving slowly and looking around to confirm what he has already learned from screens. For a driver with Verstappen’s level of experience, this streamlined approach works, but it is the product of years spent building an instinctive feel for how a circuit translates from screen to steering wheel.

Track Walks: Reading the Surface on Foot

The track walk remains one of the most traditional elements of F1 race preparation. It usually takes place on a Thursday, the day before the first practice session, and involves the driver walking the full circuit with their race engineer and sometimes other members of the engineering team. The walk covers the entire layout, typically five to seven kilometres, and can take well over an hour.

What the driver is looking for during the track walk goes far beyond a casual stroll. They are checking the condition of the kerbs, noting where the surface has been resurfaced or patched since the previous year, identifying changes in camber and elevation that are difficult to see on camera, and discussing corner-by-corner approach strategies with their engineer. The engineer, in turn, uses the walk to point out areas where the car’s setup will need specific attention, whether that is a bumpy braking zone that could unsettle the rear or a long-radius corner where tyre management will be critical.

Not every driver values the track walk equally. Verstappen has been blunt about his reasons for skipping it. “I mean honestly, to walk for like five to seven kilometres, it’s just boring,” he said. “I just prefer to do my out-lap a bit slower, look around and you’re like ‘Okay, yeah, that’s fine.'” Hamilton similarly bypasses the walk at most circuits, preferring to gather his sensory information during the first laps in the car. For drivers like Lando Norris and Charles Leclerc, however, the walk remains a non-negotiable part of their weekend routine. There is no single correct approach, and the split in preference reflects the broader truth about how F1 drivers learn each track: the methods are consistent across the grid, but the emphasis placed on each one is deeply personal.

Engineering Briefings and Setup Meetings

The learning process is not limited to what the driver does alone. A significant portion of track preparation happens in engineering briefings, both at the factory in the weeks before a race and in the team’s hospitality unit during the race weekend itself. These meetings bring together the driver, their race engineer, the performance engineer, and strategy staff to discuss how the car should be configured for the specific demands of each circuit.

Before the weekend begins, factory briefings cover the baseline aerodynamic package, suspension settings, and brake configuration that the team plans to run. These are informed by data from previous visits to the circuit, updated with any developments in the car since the last time the track was raced. The driver’s simulator feedback feeds directly into these discussions, with engineers using the driver’s subjective impressions alongside the objective telemetry data from sim sessions to arrive at a starting setup.

Car setup is where the driver’s circuit knowledge becomes tangible. A driver who understands that Turn 6 at a particular circuit has a late apex with a compression on exit can request specific rear suspension stiffness or differential settings to manage that section. The ability to translate physical track knowledge into engineering language is one of the skills that separates experienced drivers from rookies, and it is built through the repetition of racing the same circuits year after year.

Telemetry and Data Review During the Weekend

Once the race weekend begins and the car hits the track for the first time in free practice, the learning process shifts from theoretical to empirical. Modern F1 cars carry over 300 sensors that generate more than a million data points per second, covering everything from brake temperature and tyre pressure to aerodynamic load and energy recovery rates. This torrent of information is transmitted wirelessly to the pit wall in real time, where engineers monitor the car’s behaviour and relay adjustments to the driver over the radio.

Between practice sessions, driver and engineer sit down for a detailed debrief. The telemetry trace from the session is overlaid with GPS data and onboard video, allowing both parties to examine every corner in granular detail. The engineer might point out that the driver is braking 10 metres too early into Turn 3 compared to the optimal reference, or that they are carrying too much speed through a particular corner entry, causing understeer that costs time on exit. The driver, in turn, provides subjective feedback about how the car feels, information that sensors alone cannot capture, such as confidence under braking or the sensation of rear grip at mid-corner.

This feedback loop runs continuously across the weekend. Each session builds on the last, with the driver refining their approach to individual corners while the engineers adjust the car to support those refinements. By the time qualifying arrives, the driver’s understanding of the track has been shaped by simulator preparation, visual study, the track walk, engineering briefings, and multiple rounds of telemetry-driven analysis. The final qualifying lap is the product of all of these inputs compressed into a single minute of driving.

How Drivers Memorise Braking Points and Racing Lines

One of the most common questions about F1 is how drivers remember the precise braking points and racing lines for more than 20 different circuits. The answer lies in a combination of repetition, reference markers, and muscle memory. Drivers do not memorise braking points as abstract distances. Instead, they tie each braking zone to a visual reference on the trackside, a distance board, a barrier joint, a painted line, a tree, or any fixed object that they can spot at 300 km/h and use as a trigger to hit the brake pedal.

Racing lines are learned through a similar process of progressive refinement. The initial line through a corner comes from simulator work and video study. During practice sessions, the driver experiments with variations, carrying slightly more speed into one corner, using a wider entry into another, clipping a kerb that the simulator suggested was too aggressive. Each adjustment is measured against the telemetry data, and the line that delivers the best sector time becomes the one that gets locked in for qualifying and the race.

Over a career, this knowledge accumulates. A driver who has raced at Monza fifteen times does not need to relearn the circuit from scratch each September. The braking points, the racing lines, the rhythm of the track are already stored in muscle memory. The preparation before each visit is about recalibrating that stored knowledge against the current car’s performance characteristics, which change from season to season as regulations evolve, aerodynamic philosophies shift, and driver fitness and conditioning develops.

What Happens When a New Circuit Joins the Calendar

The challenge of learning a track intensifies dramatically when a completely new circuit joins the F1 calendar. Venues like Lusail in Qatar and the Las Vegas Strip Circuit arrived with no historical F1 data for teams to draw on, meaning the entire grid started from the same baseline of zero real-world experience.

For a new circuit, the preparation timeline extends well beyond the normal schedule. Teams typically add two additional simulator days in the build-up to the event, with both the race driver and the team’s reserve or simulator driver logging extensive laps. The LiDAR scan of the new track is often available months before the first race, giving engineers time to build a detailed virtual model and run thousands of simulated laps to understand the optimal setup window.

Drivers lean more heavily on onboard footage from other categories that may have already raced at the venue, or from track-day laps if no competitive racing has taken place. The track walk at a new circuit also takes on greater significance, with even drivers who normally skip it choosing to complete the full walk to assess surface conditions and elevation changes that the simulator may not perfectly replicate. The first free practice session at a new venue is noticeably different from a familiar circuit. Drivers approach it with a wider margin of caution, building speed gradually over the course of six or seven laps rather than pushing immediately to the limit.

Want more F1Chronicle.com coverage? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for the best F1 news and analysis on the internet.

Driver Training Frequently Asked Questions

Sources

ESPN: Lewis Hamilton to ‘back away’ from simulator for Canadian GP

Sky Sports: Hamilton plans to stick with not using Ferrari simulator

Mercedes-AMG F1: How does a racing driver learn a new track

Written by

Jack Renn

Jack Renn is an editor at F1 Chronicle and a veteran motorsport journalist with 25 years of experience covering Formula 1 and international motorsport. A member of the Association Internationale de la Presse Sportive (AIPS), the global body representing accredited sports journalists, Jack has spent his career reporting from paddocks and press rooms across the F1 calendar. His work spans race analysis, technical insight, and in-depth features, giving readers authoritative coverage grounded in decades of firsthand experience at the highest level of the sport.

More articles by Jack Renn →