Formula 1 Drivers Call for Urgent Meeting with FIA Over Penalty Guidelines Interpretation

Formula 1 drivers have expressed the need for an urgent meeting with the FIA to clarify the interpretation of racing guidelines. Carlos Sainz, a Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA) director and Williams driver, described the 10-second penalty given to McLaren’s Oscar Piastri at the Brazilian Grand Prix as unacceptable.

The penalty followed a collision involving Piastri and Mercedes’ Kimi Antonelli, which resulted in Antonelli hitting Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc. Sainz stated the incident was not Piastri’s fault and questioned the penalty’s fairness.

“Everyone who has raced knows Piastri could not have avoided the accident,” Sainz said. “He got a 10-second penalty, which I do not understand.”

Evidence

Sainz cited several incidents this year where penalties seemed unjustified, including three involving himself with Liam Lawson at the Dutch Grand Prix, Oliver Bearman in Italy, and Antonelli in Austin.

“I did not understand my penalty at Zandvoort,” Sainz added. “I did not understand why Ollie got a penalty in Monza after we collided. He did not deserve it. I also did not understand my penalty in Austin. Then there was the situation in Brazil.”

The drivers plan to meet FIA stewards at the Qatar Grand Prix to review a list of incidents requiring clarification. Sainz emphasized that the penalty system is not working properly, especially regarding incidents like Brazil’s.

The controversy centers on how stewards apply the FIA’s driving standards guidelines issued earlier this year. These guidelines were developed with driver input but were not approved by the GPDA before publication. Drivers feel the rules are applied rigidly, lacking consideration for the nuances of wheel-to-wheel racing.

Piastri’s penalty was based on his failure to keep his front axle alongside Antonelli’s wing mirror and locking his brakes, which stewards deemed loss of control. Sainz challenged this interpretation.

“Stewards immediately interpret a lock-up as loss of control,” Sainz said. “A lock-up does not always mean out of control. You can lock up and still hit the apex.”

Strong Backing

George Russell, Mercedes driver and GPDA director, supported this view, explaining that certain corners cause natural tire lock-ups without loss of control.

“Every corner, circuit, and incident is different,” Russell said. “Guidelines must allow for this.”

Russell also suggested the FIA consider appointing a permanent panel of stewards to ensure consistency.

Alex Albon, another GPDA director, described the FIA’s approach as open-minded and collaborative but uncertain if it will result in a clear rule set.

“There is no ‘us versus them’ attitude,” Albon said. “We appreciate that as drivers. Whether it leads to clear rules, I am not sure.”

From F1 news to tech, history to opinions, F1 Chronicle has a free Substack. To deliver the stories you want straight to your inbox, click here.

For more F1 news and videos, follow us on Microsoft Start.

New to Formula 1? Check out our Glossary of F1 Terms, and our Beginners Guide to Formula 1 to fast-track your F1 knowledge

Written by

James Rees

A passionate motorsport journalist from Wales, with over 30 years of love for the sport. A dedicated father of three, working as a content manager, covering the fast-paced world of Formula 1, Formula 2, Formula 3, Formula E, and IndyCar.

More articles by James Rees →