Williams Explains Timing of Right of Review Over Sainz Dutch GP Penalty

Motor Racing Formula One World Championship Belgian Grand Prix Sprint And Qualifying Day Spa Francorchamps, Belgium
Carlos Sainz (ESP) Atlassian Williams Racing. 26.07.2025. Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 13, Belgian Grand Prix, Spa Francorchamps, Belgium, Sprint and Qualifying Day.
Motor Racing Formula One World Championship Belgian Grand Prix Sprint And Qualifying Day Spa Francorchamps, Belgium
Carlos Sainz (ESP) Atlassian Williams Racing. 26.07.2025. Formula 1 World Championship, Rd 13, Belgian Grand Prix, Spa Francorchamps, Belgium, Sprint and Qualifying Day.

Williams team boss James Vowles has explained why the team waited until the end of the 96-hour deadline to file a right of review against Carlos Sainz’s penalty from the Dutch Grand Prix.

Sainz was handed a 10-second penalty and two penalty points on his licence for colliding with Racing Bulls driver Liam Lawson at Zandvoort. Williams subsequently filed for a review, and the FIA has confirmed a hearing will be held on Friday, 12 September, with both teams invited to present their cases.

Speaking in his regular Vowles Verdict debrief, Vowles outlined the reasoning behind the timing. “The decision to do a right of review actually took place on the Monday,” he said. “I wanted to make sure we reflected on it on the Sunday, not overreact, but rather look back through the footage on Monday, have a chat with Carlos before we make a decision to go ahead.”

Vowles stressed that the process requires more than simply re-examining existing footage: “You need information effectively that wasn’t available to the stewards at the time of the decision. And that information has to be new, and it has to be significant. Onboard footage, helicopter footage, other angles – all of that was available to the stewards at the time and therefore doesn’t comply with the requirement.”

He added that much of the time was spent assessing whether new and significant evidence could be gathered. “We’re respectful of the FIA and the stewards in the circumstance. This is not something we want to pull together in a matter of minutes, but rather make sure we’re putting forward a comprehensive case that is worth their time in order to talk through.”

The outcome of the right of review will determine whether the stewards reopen the case against Sainz and reconsider the penalty. Until then, Williams insists its approach has been measured and deliberate, aimed at ensuring fairness rather than rushing to challenge the decision.

From F1 news to tech, history to opinions, F1 Chronicle has a free Substack. To deliver the stories you want straight to your inbox, click here.

For more F1 news and videos, follow us on Microsoft Start.

New to Formula 1? Check out our Glossary of F1 Terms, and our Beginners Guide to Formula 1 to fast-track your F1 knowledge.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

More in News

Canadian Grand Prix, George Russell (image courtesy Mercedes)

George Russell Confirms Mercedes Contract Includes 2027 Performance Clause Amid Verstappen Speculation

George Russell revealed that his Mercedes deal includes a performance-based ...
Polish 20251028 061424714

Four Drivers in Contention for Red Bull and Racing Bulls 2026 Seats, Confirms Permane

Racing Bulls team principal Alan Permane has revealed that four ...
2025 Mexico City Grand Prix - Fernando Alonso (image courtesy Aston Martin)

Who Is The Oldest F1 Driver?

The oldest Formula 1 driver currently competing is Fernando Alonso, ...
Images

Talking Points From 2025 Mexican Grand Prix

The 2025 Mexican Grand Prix was a whirlwind, complicated, incident-marred ...
F1 Canadian Grand Prix 2025

Lewis Hamilton Blasts “Pretty Nuts” 10-Second Penalty After Mexico City GP Duel with Verstappen

Lewis Hamilton has criticised the 10-second time penalty he received ...

Trending on F1 Chronicle